USPTO serial 78377605
ALIS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FISHER, LATONIA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ALIS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
62217 BEAURAINS, FR
Beaurains, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert J. Patch
Mark Lebow YOUNG & THOMPSON209 Madison StreetSuite 500Alexandria, VA 22314Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Surgical and medical apparatus and instruments and members; orthopedic articles; suture materials, securement devices for the spine, cervical plates, disk prostheses, intersomatic cages, devices for occipito-cervical securement, occipital plates;; Surgical and medical apparatus and instruments and members; orthopedic articles; suture materials, securement devices for the spine, cervical plates, disk prostheses, intersomatic cages, devices for occipito-cervical securement, occipital plates | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 20, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 12, 2005 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2005 | PC.D | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED | — |
| Feb 8, 2005 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 8, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 3, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 18, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |