USPTO serial 78377956
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
CUT OFF, LA
GALLIANO, LA
Englewood, CO
ENGLEWOOD, CO
ENGLEWOOD, CO
ENGLEWOOD, CO
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bruce E. Dahl
BRUCE E DAHL DAHL & OSTERLOTH LLP555 17TH ST STE 3405DENVER, CO 80202UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Monitoring the computer systems of others for technical purposes and providing back-up computer programs and facilities, namely, electronic and network monitoring of equipment used for the purpose of data collection, data acquisition in the nature of equipment status, measured values, modulation for transmission, re-aggregation of data including database and user interfaces | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 1, 2003 |
| 045 | Monitoring of computer systems for security purposes, namely, annunciation services in the nature of alarm notification, provided by means of communications networks, in the field of government, military and energy | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 1, 2003 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 20, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 27, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 13, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 28, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 8, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 5, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 4, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 19, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 18, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 18, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 19, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 14, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 12, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 12, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 11, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 13, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 12, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 25, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 29, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 25, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 25, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 27, 2004 | GNPE | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2004 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 18, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |