USPTO serial 78378270
EVERTEC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3078547Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 11, 2006
- Examiner
- RAUEN, JAMES
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with EVERTEC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SAN JUAN, PR
SAN JUAN, PR
R??O PIEDRAS, PR
San Juan, PR
San Juan, PR
San Juan, PR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Shannah R. Urbauer
ESTELA MARTÍNEZ DE MIRANDA BANCO POPULAR DE PUERTO RICO209 MUÑOZ RIVERA AVE STE 913POPULAR CTR BLDG LEGAL DIVSAN JUAN, PR 00918Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Data management and processing services; Business management services; Business research and evaluation services; Outsourcing services in the field of technical operations and data; Business services, namely facilities management of technical operations; Database processing for financial institutions; Transaction processing, namely medical record reproduction | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 1, 2004 |
| 036 | Transaction processing, namely, credit cards, debit cards, ATM, check processing, money transfers, insurance benefit processing, payment processing; Processing and authorization of electronic transactions for financial institutions; Point of sale processing of commercial transactions | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 1, 2004 |
| 038 | Providing access to customer internal telecommunications networks from remote processing facilities; Transaction processing, namely electronic transmission of medical records via computer terminals | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 1, 2004 |
| 042 | Integration of computer systems and networks; Computer network management and technical support services, namely design and maintenance of software; Computer disaster recovery planning; Technical support services for computer systems and networks, namely troubleshooting computer systems and networks and providing back-up computer facilities; Data conversion of computer program data or information; Computer systems design and analysis; Implementation of computer systems for business applications; Design of voice systems; Consulting services in the field of information technology | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 1, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by EVERTEC, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by EVERTEC, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by EVERTEC GROUP, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Popular, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Popular, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Popular, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named EVERTEC
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 28, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 16, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 12, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 12, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 6, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 29, 2010 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 22, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 23, 2006 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 26, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 6, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 10, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 6, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 5, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 5, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 2, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 2, 2005 | CWBP | WITHDRAWN BEFORE PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 2, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 27, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 27, 2005 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 26, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 26, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 17, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 17, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2004 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 16, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 15, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 15, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 28, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 23, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 22, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 19, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |