Drawing for ITIP

USPTO serial 78378848

ITIP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MARTIN, JENNIFER MCGARRY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ITIP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

J. Christian Angle

J CHRISTIAN ANGLE RADIOSHACKMS CF4-101300 RADIOSHACK CIRCL3EFORT WORTH, TX 76102-1964

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Smart electrical connectors which determine the output voltage and/or current of a compatible power supply for use in simultaneous charging multiple electronic devices including portable, pocket, laptop and notebook computers, mobile and cellular telephones, personal digital assistants, digital video discs, compact disc, MPEG, MP3 and mobile digital music players, portable audio speakers and amplifiers, digital cameras, camcorders, portable external hard drives and memory devices, and external read/write, optical, and magnetic tape drivesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 10, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 10, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 10, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 1, 2005COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Mar 1, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 15, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 26, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 14, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 14, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 30, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 30, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 24, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 24, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 15, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 29, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 29, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 27, 2004UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 27, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 20, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 19, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance