USPTO serial 78381107
SIMPLY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WEBSTER, WILLIAM M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SIMPLY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Staples The Office Superstore LLC
Framingham, MA
Staples The Office Superstore LLC
Framingham, MA
Staples The Office Superstore, Inc.
Framingham, MA
Other trademarks owned by Staples The Office Superstore, Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Erich G. Rhynhart
Erich G. Rhynhart Staples, Inc.500 Staples DriveFramingham, MA 01702UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | pads of legal paper, loose leaf paper, and writing paper, file boxes for storage of business and personal records, pencils, paper clips, paper staples, appointment books, office desk accessories, namely, desk file trays, paper staplers, pencil sharpeners, and adhesive tape dispensers for household and stationery use | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Staples The Office Superstore LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Staples The Office Superstore LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Staples The Office Superstore, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named SIMPLY
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 12, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 12, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 28, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 28, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 28, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 11, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 11, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 11, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 29, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 8, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 13, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 13, 2006 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 22, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2006 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 5, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 13, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 5, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Dec 29, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 20, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 31, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 18, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 18, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 4, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 1, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 25, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 24, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 24, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |