Drawing for SAVVIPHARM

USPTO serial 78382302

SAVVIPHARM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RAUEN, JAMES
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SAVVIPHARM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Rashida A. Karmali

RASHIDA A KARMALI RASHIDA A KARMALI ESQ99 WALL ST 13TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10005UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Pharmaceutical preparations used in the treatment of cancer, namely, agents useful in preventing and treating cancer and drug toxicities and improving health and tolerance to chemotherapy and useful in treating alcohol and oxidative damageACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 12, 2011MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 26, 2006PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Apr 13, 2006PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Mar 8, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 4, 2006PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jan 4, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 7, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 7, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 8, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 14, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 24, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 6, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 1, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 24, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 24, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 25, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance