Drawing for VIRTUAL PROXIMITY

USPTO serial 78382714

VIRTUAL PROXIMITY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FINNEGAN, TIMOTHY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VIRTUAL PROXIMITY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark Bisard

MARK BISARD THACHER PROFFITT & WOOD LLPTWO WORLD FINANCIAL CTR 27TH FL 27TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10281UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer hardware and software sold as a unit for facilitating, establishing, maintaining and controlling virtual private network connections to applicationsABANDONED—
042Technical support services, namely facilitating, establishing, maintaining, and controlling virtual private network connections to applications, and design and development of virtual private networksABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 8, 2007ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Jan 8, 2007EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Sep 26, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 5, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 5, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 7, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 13, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 23, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 18, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 14, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 30, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 30, 2005XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 28, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Sep 28, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 3, 2005CPRAPRIORITY ACTION MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
May 2, 2005CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Apr 13, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 25, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 25, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 1, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 30, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 24, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 26, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance