USPTO serial 78383075
POWEROPEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RINGLE, JAMES W
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with POWEROPEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alexander Tognino
Alexander Tognino International Business Machines CorpNorth Castle DriveIntellectual Property & LicensingArmonk, NY 10504Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware; semiconductor devices and integrated circuits; semiconductor chips and computer hardware having specific microprocessor chips; semiconductor chips having a predefined architecture; instruction set architecture; computer software for designing and developing software applications; computer software development tools; computer operating system programs; computer software application programs which implement a subset of the specification for a set of software interfaces for designing and developing software applications in a specific environment; and instruction manuals sold therewith | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Printed matter, namely, magazines, books, pamphlets, brochures, manuals, presentation materials, teaching materials, all relating to designing and developing a computer hardware architecture and computer software applications and programs | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Custom installation, repair and maintenance of computer hardware | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer project management services; consulting services concerning design and development of computer software programs and architecture and computer hardware architecture; consulting services in the field of designing, developing and using computer hardware and computer software; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer hardware and computer software problems; integration of computer hardware and software; computer software and hardware testing services; installation, updating and maintenance of computer software; computer programming for others; computer consulting services in the field of computer hardware and computer software for managing hardware and software and processes that exist within an information technology environment; and computer systems analysis | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by International Business Machines Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by International Business Machines Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named POWEROPEN
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 16, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 16, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 8, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 8, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 4, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 21, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 21, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 11, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 10, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 6, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 3, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 3, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 3, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 18, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 18, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 10, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 15, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 26, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 16, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 14, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 4, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 29, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 21, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 25, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |