Drawing for KING CAN

USPTO serial 78384693

KING CAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GOODSAID, IRA
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with KING CAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James M. Slattery (Reg. No. 28,380)

JAMES M SLATTERY (REG NO 28,380) BIRCH, STEWART, KOLASCH & BIRCH LLPPO BOX 747FALLS CHURCH, VA 22040-0747UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Air, carbon dioxide and oxygen sensorsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 8, 2006MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Sep 8, 2006ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Sep 8, 2006OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
May 10, 2006OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Dec 6, 2005ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Nov 15, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 26, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 27, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 23, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 22, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 22, 2005GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 22, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 22, 2005ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Sep 3, 2005PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Jun 1, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 27, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 24, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 24, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 28, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 28, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 27, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 27, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 27, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 29, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance