USPTO serial 78384714
FOOTSIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAYERSCHOFF, GLENN
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FOOTSIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Costa Mesa, CA
Costa Mesa, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bao Quoc Nguyen
17011 BEACH BLVD STE 900HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Shoes excluding children's shoes | ABANDONED | Sep 20, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 19, 2007 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jan 18, 2007 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 15, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 19, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 31, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 7, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 16, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 29, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 28, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 25, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 21, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 19, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 18, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 18, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 18, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 25, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 25, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 27, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 29, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |