USPTO serial 78385162
YOSHIDA KABAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WELLS, KELLEY L
- Law office
- OFFICE OF THE TRADEMARK COMMISSIONER
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with YOSHIDA KABAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Danielle I. Mattessich
Danielle I. Mattessich Merchant & Gould P.C.P.O. Box 2910Minneapolis, MN 55402-0910UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | CLOTHING, NAMELY, HATS, CAPS, VISORS, HEADBANDS, HOODS, BANDANAS, SCARVES, NECKTIES, MUFFLERS, HANDKERCHIEFS, WRIST BANDS, SUSPENDERS, SHIRTS, T-SHIRTS, TANK TOPS, BLOUSES, PULLOVERS, TOPS, SUITS, JACKETS, PARKAS, COATS, SWEATERS, VESTS, SWEAT SHIRTS, PANTS, SLACKS, JEANS, OVERALLS, SWEAT PANTS, SHORTS, BOTTOMS, SKIRTS, DRESSES, GOWNS; UNDERGARMENTS; UNDERWEAR, NAMELY, BOXER SHORTS, UNDERSHORTS, UNDERPANTS, BRAS, LINGERIE, PANTYHOSE, SOCKS, HOSIERY, STOCKINGS; FOOTWEAR, NAMELY, SHOES, BOOTS, SANDALS AND SLIPPERS; GLOVES, MITTENS; SWIM WEAR, RAINWEAR; BEACHWEAR; SWIM SUITS; LEOTARDS, LEGGINGS, TIGHTS; PAJAMAS, ROBES, SLEEPWEAR; LOUNGEWEAR; BELTS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 15, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 15, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 7, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 7, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 7, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 23, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 23, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 4, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 4, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 4, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 12, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 8, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 6, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 6, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 3, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 3, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 3, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 6, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 15, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 23, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 11, 2005 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Aug 11, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 3, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 23, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 15, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 11, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 11, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 27, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 29, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |