Drawing for XBLADE

USPTO serial 78385519

XBLADE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PINO, BRIAN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with XBLADE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Plug-in computer peripherals and computer software for servers for enabling trusted information sharing between remote institutions to prevent unauthorized access and to warn of corruption of date and web services accross disparate security domains and complex business processes.ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 23, 2010UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Apr 12, 2010MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 12, 2010ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 29, 2009UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Oct 29, 2009UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Sep 14, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 14, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 11, 2009RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Sep 10, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 10, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 4, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 3, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 7, 2007WOAGWITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED—
Sep 7, 2007WOARTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED—
Aug 29, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 20, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 20, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 8, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 15, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 6, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 28, 2005GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 28, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 21, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 15, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 15, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 21, 2005GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 21, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 14, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 29, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 29, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 29, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 16, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 29, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 29, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 27, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 30, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance