USPTO serial 78386660
EAT LIFE UP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FAINT, MARY CATHERINE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EAT LIFE UP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
T. Maria Lam, Esq.
CHARLES E WEINSTEIN ESQ FOLEY HOAG LLPSEAPORT WORLD TRADE CTR W155 SEAPORT BLVDBOSTON, MA 02210-2600Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Meat, fish, poultry and game; meat extracts; preserved, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables; jellies, jams, compotes; eggs, milk and milk products, excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yoghurt; edible oils and fats; prepared foods and meals in this class consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry or vegetables; packaged takeaway foods in this class consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry, or vegetables; snack foods in this class,namely, potato-based snack foods, legume-based snack foods and snack foods based on dried or cooked fruit, dried or cooked vegetables, and dried or cooked nuts; soup; salads, namely, fruit salads, vegetable salads, and garden salads; yoghurt and yoghurt products, namely, yoghurt drinks, yoghurt bars, and yoghurt cups | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Coffee, chocolate, tea, cocoa, sugar, rice, tapioca, sago, artificial coffee; flour and preparations made from cereals, bread, pastry and confectionery, namely, muesli-based snack bars, fruit-based snack bars, candy, chocolate, lollipops, mints; ices, namely ice cream, icy poles and ice pops; honey, treacle; yeast, baking-powder; salt, mustard; vinegar, sauces; condiments, namely salad dressings, flavored mustard, relish, pickle relish, salsa, picante sauce, hot sauce, chili sauces, savory sauces, fruit sauces, marinades, glazes, mayonnaise, pepper oil, fruit dipping sauces, chocolate syrup, and corn syrup; spices; bakery products, namely, cakes, biscuits, prepared desserts, namely cookies, flour-based and tortilla-based preparations filled with fruit; pasta, prepared pasta dishes and salads; pies, pastries, pizzas, sandwiches, filled bread rolls, spring rolls, sushi, tortillas; frozen yoghurt; prepared meals in this class consisting primarily of pasta or rice; packaged takeaway foods in this class consisting primarily of pasta or rice; snack foods in this class namely pasta salads, rice salads, noodle salads and macaroni salads | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | Services for providing foods and drink; temporary accommodation; restaurant, café, bar and bistro services; catering services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 8, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 11, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 10, 2005 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 9, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 4, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 13, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 31, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 29, 2004 | GNPE | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2004 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 28, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 7, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 30, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |