USPTO serial 78387253
AMERICASDOCTOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CAPSHAW, DANIEL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AMERICASDOCTOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sandra B. Weiss
Sandra B. Weiss McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP300 S. Wacker DriveSuite 3100Chicago, IL 60606Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Providing general business administration and management service of a business nature for clinical trial sites in the field of clinical research and testing of pharmaceutical, pharmacogenomic, nutritional, biotechnical or medical products or devices; namely, sales and marketing consulting; Providing general business administration and management service of a business nature for clinical trial sites in the field of clinical research and testing of pharmaceutical, pharmacogenomic, nutritional, biotechnical or medical products or devices, namely, consulting services relating to the development, defense, and negotiation of sales proposals for clinical trials; Providing general business administration and management service of a business nature for clinical trial sites in the field of clinical research and testing of pharmaceutical, pharmacogenomic, nutritional, biotechnical or medical products or devices, namely, consulting services relating to the development of business standard operating procedures for clinical trials | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Educational services in the nature of providing courses, training, testing and workshops in the fields of clinical research and product lifecycle management, and distributing course materials in connection therewith; and training clinical trial site personnel in the use of tests and rating systems for clinical trial protocols, and in the use of medical and research equipment for clinical trial protocols | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Technical assistance in the preparation and processing of regulatory documents for compliance with healthcare and clinical research guidelines and regulations; Consulting services relating to the development of technical standard operating procedures for clinical trials; Consulting services relating to quality control for documents and processes involved in the conduct of clinical trials in the field of clinical research and testing of pharmaceutical,pharmacogenomic, biotechnical, nutritional or medical products and devices | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ESSENTIAL GROUP, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by AmericasDoctor, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by ESSENTIAL GROUP, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named AMERICASDOCTOR
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 13, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 13, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 22, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 22, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 9, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 17, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 22, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 22, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 5, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 5, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 12, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 20, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 28, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 2, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 8, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 7, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 7, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 21, 2006 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2006 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 29, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 28, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 16, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 2, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 8, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 13, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 13, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 26, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 8, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 8, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 6, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 1, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |