Drawing for SPELLBINDERS

USPTO serial 78387742

SPELLBINDERS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3151646Status 711
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 3, 2006
Examiner
WILLIS, PAMELA Y
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SPELLBINDERS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Patrick D. Floyd

Patrick D. Floyd FAY SHARPE LLP1228 Euclid AvenueThe Halle Building, 5th FloorCleveland, OH 44115

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
008hand-operated machines for embossing or die-cutting and polymer pads and dies for use therewithSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLEDJul 1, 2003

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 25, 2011C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL—
Feb 10, 2011C7RFREQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED—
Feb 10, 2011APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Feb 10, 2011ES7STEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED—
Oct 21, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Oct 14, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Sep 16, 2009ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Sep 9, 2009ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Feb 6, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 3, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 16, 2006REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 11, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 8, 2006CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Jul 3, 2006SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 15, 2006IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jun 15, 2006EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Apr 11, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 17, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 28, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 30, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 15, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 14, 2005XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 10, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 9, 2005GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 9, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 9, 2005GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 9, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 18, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Apr 8, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 28, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 28, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 5, 2005FAXXFAX SENT—
Sep 29, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 29, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 29, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 31, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance