USPTO serial 78388731
PLAYGIRL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KELLY, JOHN M
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PLAYGIRL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence E. Abelman
LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 3RD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | CLOTHING FOR WOMEN AND CHILDREN, NAMELY SHIRTS, SHORTS, LINGERIE, UNDERWEAR, BRASSIERIES, SLIPS, SWIMWEAR, HOSIERY, SOCKS, STOCKINGS, FOOT WEAR, SWEATPANTS, SWEATSHIRTS, LEOTARDS, COATS, RAINCOATS, ANORAKS, PARKAS, BLAZERS, JACKETS, CARDIGANS, BOLEROS, SPORT COATS, WIND RESISTANT JACKETS, SUITS, VESTS, DRESSES, EVENING GOWNS, JUMPERS, SKIRTS, PANTS, SLACKS, JEANS, DUNGAREES, JUMPSUITS, OVERALLS, COVERALLS, FLIGHT SUITS, GYM SUITS, JOGGING SUITS, THERMAL UNDERWEAR, SKORTS, ROMPERS, CULOTTES, SHORTALLS, SWEATERS, JERSEYS, BLOUSES, TUNICS, T-SHIRTS, HALTER TOPS, TANK TOPS, BODYSUITS, UNITARDS, CAMISOLES, CHEMISES, UNDERSHIRTS, FOUNDATION GARMENTS, BODYSHAPERS, BUSTIERS, GARTER BELTS, BRIEFS, BLOOMERS, UNDERPANTS, PANTIES, LINGERIE, LOUNGEWEAR, NIGHTGOWNS, NIGHT SHIRTS, NEGLIGEES, ROBES, PAJAMAS, HOSIERY, PANTYHOSE, TIGHTS, KNEE HIGHS, LEG WARMERS, LEGGINGS, HEAD WEAR, HATS, CAPS, HOODS, HEAD BANDS, NECKTIES, BOW TIES, ASCOTS, POCKET SQUARES, SCARVES, SHAWLS, NECKERCHIEFS, GLOVES, MITTENS, BELTS, SASHES, CUMMERBUNDS, BOOTS, ATHLETIC SHOES, ATHLETIC FOOTWEAR, GALOSHES, BATHING SUITS, BATHING TRUNKS, BEACHWEAR, BEACH COVERUPS, SARONGS, SKI WEAR, SKI SUITS, SKI PANTS, SKI GLOVES, THERMAL SOCKS, INFANT WEAR, CLOTH BIBS, BOOTIES, BABY BUNTING, PLAYSUITS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 8, 2011 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 8, 2011 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 8, 2011 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 8, 2011 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 4, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 20, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 30, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 26, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 26, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 15, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 6, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 28, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 19, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 19, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 29, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 18, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 8, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 18, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 2, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 1, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |