USPTO serial 78389002
DOWN IN SOUTHERN COMFORT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RADEMACHER, MARK A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DOWN IN SOUTHERN COMFORT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Delphine James
DELPHINE JAMES DELPHINE JAMES ATTORNEY AT LAW2656 S LOOP W #170HOUSTON, TX 77054UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Men's, Women's and Children's wearing apparel, namely, T-Shirts, Head Gear, Foot Gear, Shirts, Pants, Dresses, Blouses, Skirts, Sport Jackets, Sport Pants | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 28, 2006 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 24, 2006 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jan 3, 2006 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2006 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 3, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 18, 2005 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 9, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 9, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 7, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 2, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 5, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 4, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 24, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 7, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 21, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 2, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |