USPTO serial 78389601
CLEVELAND CRUSADERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GRAY, CAROLYN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CLEVELAND CRUSADERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Niagara Falls, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Stuffed toys; playing cards; jigsaw puzzles, manipulative puzzles; toy action figures; plush and ride-on toys, plush animals toys, suction cup animals, suction cup hockey pucks, flying discs, dolls, bobble head dolls, puppets, plastic toy canteens, balloons, yo-yos; hand held units for playing electronic games; Christmas tree ornaments; Christmas stockings; table-top hockey games; hockey equipment, namely, hockey sticks, hockey stick handles, hockey stick blades, hockey stick replacement blades, hockey stick bags specifically designed for carrying hockey sticks, hockey gloves, hockey skates, hockey skate blade protectors, hockey shin guards, hockey elbow pads, hockey shoulder pads, hockey shin pads, hockey neck protectors, hockey wrist protectors, hockey equipment bags specifically designed for carrying hockey equipment, hockey goalie sticks, hockey goalie stick blades, hockey goalie stick replacement blades, hockey goalie pads, hockey goalie catch mitts, hockey goalie blockers, hockey goalie arm and body protectors, hockey goalie chest protectors, hockey goalie masks, hockey goaltender skates goalie equipment bags specifically designed for carrying hockey goalie protective equipment, hockey pucks; street hockey equipment namely hockey sticks, hockey stick tape, hockey nets, goalie sticks, hockey pucks, hockey balls, pads for street hockey, goalie pads, hockey gloves, hockey face masks, and athletic equipment namely sports bags fitted to carry street hockey goalie pads and gloves and all for street hockey; roller skates, in-line roller skates, in-line roller hockey skates, and in-line roller training skates | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 6, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 6, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 6, 2006 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 10, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 7, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 29, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 16, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 23, 2004 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| Dec 13, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 1, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |