USPTO serial 78389690
RED NOSE FUND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AYALA, LOURDES
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RED NOSE FUND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Meyer A. Gross
Meyer A. Gross Schweitzer Cornman Gross & Bondell LLP292 Madison Avenue19th FloorNew York, NY 10017Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | CHARITABLE FUND RAISING SERVICES; ADVISORY AND CONSULTING IN THE FIELD OF CHARITABLE FUND RAISING | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, ORGANIZING INFORMATIVE EXHIBITIONS FOR CHARITABLE PURPOSES TO HIGHLIGHT WORTHY CAUSES; PROVIDING AN ON-GOING TELEVISION VARIETY SHOW DURING WHICH VIEWERS CAN TELEPHONE IN TO PLEDGE DONATIONS TO CHARITY; PRODUCTION AND DISTRIBUTION OF TELEVISION PROGRAMS; PROVISION OF AND CONDUCTING SPORTING EVENTS, NAMELY, ATHLETIC EVENTS, NAMELY, RACES AND EXHIBITIONS OF FOOTBALL, SOCCER, SWIMMING, CRICKET AND MOTOR RACING; ARRANGING AND CONDUCTING ATHLETIC COMPETITIONS; production of live musical concerts; music production services; ENTERTAINMENT IN THE NATURE OF LIVE MUSICAL CONCERTS; THEATRE PRODUCTIONS; PERSONAL APPEARANCES BY FILM, SPORTS AND MUSIC CELEBRITIES; ORGANIZING COMMUNITY EVENTS AND FESTIVALS FEATURING A VARIETY OF ACTIVITIES, NAMELY, SPORTING EVENTS, EXHIBITIONS, THEATRE PRODUCTIONS, LIVE MUSICAL CONCERTS, FLEA MARKETS, ETHNIC DANCES AND THE LIKE; PRODUCTION OF RADIO AND TELEVISION PROGRAMS; EDUCATIONAL SERVICES IN THE NATURE OF SEMINARS, COURSES, LECTURES AND CONFERENCES AND THE DISSEMINATION OF EDUCATIONAL MATERIALS OF OTHERS, ALL RELATING TO CHARITIES AND CHARITABLE FUNDRAISING AVAILABLE ON OR OFF LINE VIA A COMPUTER NETWORK OR THE INTERNET; ARRANGING AND CONDUCTING EDUCATIONAL CONFERENCES AND SEMINARS ALL RELATING TO CHARITIES AND CHARITABLE FUNDRAISING AVAILABLE ON OR OFF LINE VIA A COMPUTER NETWORK OR THE INTERNET; EDUCATIONAL research, NAMELY, COMPILATION OF LESSON PLANS, COURSE MATERIALS, AND CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT FOR OTHERS, TRAINING TECHNIQUES FOR ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY SCHOOL TEACHERS AND ADMINISTRATORS ALL RELATING TO CHARITIES AND CHARITABLE FUNDRAISING AVAILABLE ON OR OFF LINE VIA A COMPUTER NETWORK OR THE INTERNET; DEVELOPMENT OF EDUCATIONAL LESSON PLANS FOR OTHERS TEACHING A VARIETY OF SUBJECTS ALL RELATING TO CHARITIES AND CHARITABLE FUNDRAISING AVAILABLE ON OR OFF LINE VIA A COMPUTER NETWORK OR THE INTERNET | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Comic Relief Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Comic Relief Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named RED NOSE FUND
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 9, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 9, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 2, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 2, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 10, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 10, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 6, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 6, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 9, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 9, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 6, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 6, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 10, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 18, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 28, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 18, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 15, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 8, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 7, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 1, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 1, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 17, 2005 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| May 15, 2005 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Apr 25, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 6, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 6, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 7, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 1, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |