USPTO serial 78389782
EAS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LE, KHANH M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EAS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ursula B. Day, Esq.
Ursula B. Day Law Firm of Ursula B. Day708 Third AvenueSuite 1501New York, NY 10017Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | MICROPROCESSORS, SPEECH PROCESSORS FOR COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; SOFTWARE AND COMPUTER PROGRAMS FEATURING INTERACTIVE TEACHING AND TESTING MATERIAL FOR AUDITORY AND OPTICAL TRAINING; PRERECORDED DATA CARRIERS WITH INFORMATION FOR SURGICAL AND AUDIOLOGY TRAINING; PRERECORDED DATA CARRIERS WITH PROGRAMS FOR TESTING AND EVALUATION OF SPEECH RECOGNITION | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | SURGICAL IMPLANTS COMPOSED PRIMARILY OF ARTIFICIAL MATERIAL, COCHLEAR IMPLANT SYSTEMS COMPOSED PRIMARILY OF ARTIFICIAL MATERIAL; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS COMPOSED PRIMARILY OF ARTIFICIAL MATERIAL; ELECTRODES FOR MEDICAL PURPOSES, ELECTRODES FOR USE IN IMPLANTS COMPOSED OF ELECTRODE MATERIAL; DIAGNOSTIC APPARATUS FOR MEDICAL PURPOSE; HEARING AIDS; HEARING PROSTHESES; HEARING AIDS FOR PARTIAL OR COMPLETE IMPLANTATION, SURGICAL DEVICES AND INSTRUMENTS FOR SURGERY IN THE INNER EAR | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | PRINTED BOOKS AND JOURNALS IN THE FIELD OF EDUCATION AND TRAINING IN SURGERY AND AUDIOLOGY; PRINTED PROTOCOLS FOR TESTING AND EVALUATION OF SPEECH RECOGNITION | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | TEACHING IN THE FIELD OF SURGERY AND AUDIOLOGY; PROVIDING MEDICAL TRAINING IN THE FIELD OF SURGERY AND AUDIOLOGY | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MED-EL Elektromedizinische Gerate Ges. m.b.H.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named EAS
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 23, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 4, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 1, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 23, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 11, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 20, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 7, 2006 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 21, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 16, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 15, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 15, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 23, 2005 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jul 11, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 27, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 27, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 13, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 13, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 5, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 6, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 1, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |