USPTO serial 78390039
MFRIEND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MFRIEND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter G. Mack and Norm J. Rich
PETER G MACK AND NORM J RICH FOLEY & LARDNER3000 K ST NW STE 500WASHINGTON, DC 20007UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Mobile phones and cellular phones | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Providing on-line electronic bulletin boards for transmission of messages among computer users concerning designing and developing software applications for mobile phones and cellular phones and for designing and developing mobile phones and cellular phones | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Providing news in the nature of current events reporting; providing on-line newsletters in the field of designing and developing software applications for mobile phones and cellular phones, and for designing and developing mobile phones and cellular phones; providing on-line newsletters in the field of designing and developing software applications for mobile phones and cellular phones, and designing and developing mobile phones and cellular phones via email; educational services, namely, conducting classes, seminars, conferences and workshops in the field of designing and developing software applications for mobile phones and cellular phones, and for designing and developing mobile phones and cellular phones. | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Technical consultation for content providers and content designers in the field of mobile phones and cellular phones; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer software problems relating to mobile phones and cellular phones via telephone, e-mail, in person and through local and global computer information networks; computer software design for others and computer software development in the field of mobile phones and cellular phones; computer consultation and advice relating to designing and developing software applications for mobile phones and cellular phones, and for designing mobile phones and cellular phones; providing on-line information in the field of designing and developing software applications for mobile phones and cellular phones, and for designing and developing mobile phones and cellular phones; providing on-line information in the field of designing and developing software applications for mobile phones and cellular phones, and for designing and developing mobile phones and cellular phones via email. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Nippon Denki Kabushiki Kaisha
- Other trademarks owned by Nippon Denki Kabushiki Kaisha
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named MFRIEND
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 31, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 31, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 10, 2006 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Dec 19, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 30, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 10, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 22, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 15, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 11, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 8, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 8, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 2, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |