Drawing for BOWLING ALLEY

USPTO serial 78390837

BOWLING ALLEY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NELSON, EDWARD
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BOWLING ALLEY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Howard N. Aronson

HOWARD N ARONSON LACKENBACH SIEGEL LLPPO BOX 416SCARSDALE, NY 10583UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
002VARNISHESACTIVEJan 1, 2000

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 28, 2005MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Oct 28, 2005ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Oct 27, 2005EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
May 12, 2005GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 12, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 22, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 30, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 30, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 11, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 11, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 8, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 2, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance