USPTO serial 78391014
INNERLOC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DE JONGE, KATHLEEN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INNERLOC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert W. Strozier
ROBERT W STROZIER ROBERT W STROZIER PLLCPO BOX 429BELLAIRE, TX 77402-0429UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Annunciator panels, detector switches and relays for actuating an alarm, audible and silent burglar alarms and indicators, battery chargers, computerized access controls, computerized security systems comprising security alarms and operating software therefor, access control and alarm monitoring systems, electrified door locks, electronic door locks, computer-controlled key card-making apparatus, magnetically-encoded key cards and electrically controlled door locks activated by such key cards, combined electronically controlled door holder/closer, electric door control and monitoring panels, electrical automatic door operators, electromagnetic door releases, electromagnetic locks, electromechanical door holders, electromechanical door holder/releases, electromechanical door holder/closers, electromechanical door latches, electronic locks operated by key card, electronic and electrical security devices, namely, security access control consoles, car-operated locks, namely, key pad-operated electronic locks, solenoid-operated electronic locks, detector switches and relays, key card controlled electronic security systems comprising alarm and control modules, interface electronics and personal computer hardware and monitoring and tracking software, locks operated by internal computer, magnetic card readers, security systems comprising radio frequency transmitters, security alarms, operating system and security apparatuses, namely, scanners, microprocessor controlled door locks actuated by encoded cards, power switches, radio frequency transmitters, electrical wires, visual and audible annunciators, and power supplies and battery back-ups for power supplies | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 13, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 13, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 27, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 4, 2006 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Oct 4, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 4, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 5, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 3, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 11, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 21, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 8, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 5, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 2, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 2, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 29, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 23, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 21, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 21, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 17, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 17, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 16, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 16, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 8, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 5, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |