Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 78391085?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/78391085. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns SILICON INK?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 78391085, the listed owner(s) include: Kovio, Inc..

What is USPTO serial number 78391085?

Serial number 78391085 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark SILICON INK. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

Which trademark classes cover SILICON INK?

The public record lists International Classes: 001, 007, 009. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

USPTO serial 78391085

SILICON INK

Q: What is the current status of SILICON INK?

SILICON INK (78391085) currently shows USPTO status code 603 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603

Filing date: Mar 25, 2004
Status date: Aug 2, 2006
Registration date: —
Examiner: SHANOSKI, JOANNA MARIE
Law office: TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SILICON INK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

Kovio, Inc.
Sunnyvale, CA
Other trademarks owned by Kovio, Inc.

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sally M. Abel, Esq., Karen Marie Kitterman, Esq.

SALLY M ABEL, ESQ KAREN MARIE KITTERM FENWICK & WEST LLP801 CALIFORNIA STMOUNTAIN VIEW, CA 94041UNITED STATES

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
001	CHEMICALS, NAMELY DOPING COMPOUNDS FOR USE IN THE MANUFACTURE OF SEMICONDUCTORS ANT) DOPING COMPOUNDS FOR USE TN THE MANUFACTURE OF PRINTED CIRCUITS, NANOPARTICLE-CONTAINING SOLUTIONS, FUNCTIONALIZED NANOPARTICLES, ORGANOMETALLIC COMPOUNDS, DIELECTRICS, NAMELY, INSULATORS, ALL FOR USE IN THE MANUFACTURE OF ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS, SEMICONDUCTOR COMPONENTS AND DEVICES	ACTIVE	—
007	FLUIDIC DISPENSING MACHINES FOR MANUFACTURING ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS, SEMICONDUCTOR COMPONENTS, DEVICES, AND SYSTEMS	ACTIVE	—
009	SEMICONDUCTOR CHIPS; SEMICONDUCTORS; PRINTED CIRCUITS; RADIO FREQUENCY IDENTIFICATION DEVICES, NAMELY TRANSMITTERS AND RECEIVERS; DIODES; TRANSISTORS; CAPACITORS; VARIABLE CAPACITORS; EVAPORATION EQUIPMENT FOR USING IN MANUFACTURING SEMICONDUCTORS; PHOTO VOLTAIC CELLS; SOLAR CELLS	ACTIVE	—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Aug 30, 2006	MAB3	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Aug 30, 2006	EXPT	EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED	—
Aug 2, 2006	ABN3	ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Aug 1, 2006	EXFB	EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF	—
May 22, 2006	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
May 19, 2006	GECD	ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED	—
May 19, 2006	CNCF	ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED	—
May 18, 2006	JURT	JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY	—
May 11, 2006	ACEC	AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED	—
May 2, 2006	EXPI	EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED	—
Apr 27, 2006	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Apr 27, 2006	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Feb 6, 2006	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Oct 21, 2005	GRML	CORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED	—
Oct 21, 2005	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 30, 2005	PETG	PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED	—
Aug 5, 2005	PETR	PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED	—
Aug 5, 2005	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
May 31, 2005	MAB2	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 31, 2005	ABN2	ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 19, 2004	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 18, 2004	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 7, 2004	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Apr 6, 2004	NWAP	NEW APPLICATION ENTERED	—