Drawing for EP

USPTO serial 78391739

EP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SHIH, SALLY
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Wendy S. Neal

WENDY S NEAL SNELL & WILMER LLP400 E VAN BURENPHOENIX, AZ 85004UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
037Providing cleaning services for containers for others in the pharmaceutical, biotechnology, semiconductor, and environmental industriesACTIVEOct 1, 1987

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 9, 2005MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Jun 8, 2005ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jun 7, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 7, 2005ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jun 7, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 6, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 1, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 27, 2005LOAPLETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED—
May 20, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 18, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 17, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 17, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 18, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 17, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 13, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 6, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance