USPTO serial 78392630
IGGY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ANKRAH, NAAKWAMA S
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with IGGY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Leonard C. Dunavant, Jr.
LEONARD C DUNAVANT JR STOKES BARTHOLOMEW EVANS & PETREE PA1000 RIDGEWAY LOOP RD STE 200MEMPHIS, TN 38120UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 13, 2006 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 13, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 13, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 13, 2006 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 6, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 30, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 18, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 23, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 14, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 8, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 22, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 21, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 26, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 15, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 6, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |