Drawing for WILD BLUE YONDER

USPTO serial 78392837

WILD BLUE YONDER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KEATING, MICHAEL P
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WILD BLUE YONDER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David A. Weinstein

DAVID A WEINSTEIN DAVID A WEINSTEIN1600 BROADWAY STE 2600DENVER, CO 80202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business services, namely, on-line retail store services featuring unique gift items, artwork, technology gadgets, luxury jewelry, and exotic trips all targeted to an affluent, traveler lifestyleACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 6, 2007MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Aug 6, 2007ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Aug 3, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 9, 2007GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
May 9, 2007CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
May 5, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 4, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 4, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 12, 2007GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Apr 12, 2007CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN—
Apr 4, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 4, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 4, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 27, 2007PGRRPETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED—
Feb 14, 2007PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Feb 14, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 14, 2007PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jan 29, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 19, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 19, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 23, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 23, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 23, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 15, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 21, 2005GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Nov 21, 2005CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Nov 14, 2005ATRQATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED—
Nov 14, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 10, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 10, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 10, 2005EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 10, 2005JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 10, 2005EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 11, 2005GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 11, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 28, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 15, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 15, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 15, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 15, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 15, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 6, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance