USPTO serial 78393167
FRUTIER LIXTO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3635361Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 9, 2009
- Examiner
- WHITE, RICHARD F
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with FRUTIER LIXTO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Publicidad y Servicios ARCA, S.A. de C.V.
Monterrey, MX
Other trademarks owned by Publicidad y Servicios ARCA, S.A. de C.V.
DESARROLLADORA ARCA, S.A. DE C.V.
MONTERREY, NUEVO LEON, MX
DESARROLLADORA ARCA, S.A. DE C.V.
MONTERREY, NUEVO LEON, MX
DESARROLLADORA ARCA, S.A. DE C.V.
MONTERREY, NUEVO LEON, MX
PUBLICIDAD EFICAZ, S.A. DE C.V.
MONTERREY, NUEVO LEON, MX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Louis K. Ebling
LOUIS K EBLING GREENEBAUM DOLL & MCDONALD PLLC225 E FIFTH ST STE 2800CHEMED CTRCINCINNATI, OH 45202-4728Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Powdered fruit drinks, fruit juices and fruit-flavored beverages | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Publicidad y Servicios ARCA, S.A. de C.V.
- Other trademarks owned by DESARROLLADORA ARCA, S.A. DE C.V.
- Other trademarks owned by DESARROLLADORA ARCA, S.A. DE C.V.
- Other trademarks owned by DESARROLLADORA ARCA, S.A. DE C.V.
- Other trademarks owned by PUBLICIDAD EFICAZ, S.A. DE C.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named FRUTIER LIXTO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 9, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 18, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 1, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 24, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 4, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 14, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 13, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 13, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 29, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 22, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 16, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 15, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 8, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 31, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 31, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 2, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 30, 2006 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 28, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 28, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 14, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 6, 2005 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 5, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 5, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 21, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 21, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 21, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 21, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 8, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |