USPTO serial 78393197
HCO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HINES, REGINA C
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HCO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William P. Matthews
WILLIAM P MATTHEWS FOULSTON SIEFKIN LLP100 N BROADWAY STE 700WICHITA, KS 67202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | A housemark for a full line of house and garden products made of non-precious metal, namely, hose hangers, hose holders, hose guides, hose extenders, fireplace accessories, namely, metal firewood containers; arbors, trellises, ornamental windmills, wind-activated kinetic sculptures made of non-precious metal, decorative crosses made of non-precious metal, shepherd hooks, decorative obelisks, decorative wall and fence art made primarily of metal, garden screens, fencing, hooks, containers, bells, rain bells, garden stakes, pot stakes, statuary, metal hangers, decorative sculptures, and decorative armillary spheres made of metal. | ACTIVE | Oct 6, 2003 |
| 011 | A housemark for a full line of house and garden products, namely, water fountains. | ACTIVE | Oct 6, 2003 |
| 016 | A housemark for a full line of house and garden products, namely, cardboard product displays featuring house and garden products. | ACTIVE | Oct 6, 2003 |
| 020 | A housemark for a full line of house and garden products made of wood, plastic, or resin, namely, plant stands, decorative mobiles, wind chimes; resin containers, and furniture. | ACTIVE | Oct 6, 2003 |
| 021 | A housemark for a full line of house and garden products, made of glass or ceramic, namely, glass containers, animal feeders, wasp catchers, bird feeders, bird houses, bird baths statuary, plant caddies, water misters, watering cans, decorative glass globes not for Christmas tree ornaments, flower pot holders, moss baskets, trivets, animal feeders and bird feeders made of ceramic or glass, grass and lawn sprinklers, vases, planters for flowers and plants, wood containers, sun catchers, glass and ceramic bells; and bird accessories, namely branch hangers for bird feeders, deck mounting brackets for bird feeders, seed scoops, seed bins, cleaning brushes for bird cages and bird feeders, posts and poles for bird feeders, and squirrel pole and post baffles for discouraging squirrels from access to bird feeders. | ACTIVE | Oct 6, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by The Hayes Company, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named HCO
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 2, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 2, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 3, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 18, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 18, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 10, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 10, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 4, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 16, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 8, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |