USPTO serial 78393350
PRINCESS VON HOHENZOLLERN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ELTON, DAVID JONATHAN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PRINCESS VON HOHENZOLLERN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT W SACOFF
ROBERT W SACOFF PATTISHALL MCAULIFFE NEWBURY ET AL311 S WACKER DR STE 5000CHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Perfume, toilet water, bath and shower gels and bath salts; toilet soap; deodorant for personal use, cosmetic products for body and beauty care, namely cream, milk, lotion, gels and powder for the face, body and hands; non-medicated milk, gels and oils for tanning and sun aftercare, make-up products for the face and body; lipstick; lip gloss; rouge; mascara; eye shadow; eye liner; lip liner; make-up powder; make-up foundation; shampoo, gels, foam and balm, and aerosol sprays for hairdressing and hair care; hair lotions, hair tinting lotion, hair lacquer; hair dye and hair bleachers; permanent waves preparations; preparations used to style hair using the water wave method; essential oils for personal use, all for women, men, and children | ACTIVE | — |
| 014 | Jewelry; precious stones; rhinestones; costume jewelry; diadems | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | Purses, wallets, umbrellas; fashion accessories for animals, namely, collars, leashes and dog jumpers | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, pants, skirts, suits, shorts, dresses, shirts, t-shirts, sweatshirts, blouses, coats, jackets, pullovers, scarves, nightgowns, socks, stockings, underwear, sportswear, namely, golf shirts and golf trousers, swim wear, all for men, women, and children; evening wear, namely, evening gowns and dresses, tuxedos and dinner jackets; wedding gowns; fashion accessories, namely, belts, neckties, gloves, suspenders, stoles, fur stoles; footwear; headgear, namely, hats, caps and bonnets | ACTIVE | — |
| 026 | Hair decorations, namely, barrettes, hair ties | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Sweets, namely, candies, chewing gum, chewy fruit-flavored candy; jelly beans, sweetmeats, and chocolates; biscuits; cookies; cakes; pralines; pastries; and ice cream | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by von Hohenzollern, Maja Prinzessin
- Other trademarks owned by von Hohenzollern, Maja Prinzessin
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 026
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named PRINCESS VON HOHENZOLLERN
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 12, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 6, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 28, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 5, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 16, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 26, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 26, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 26, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 1, 2006 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 3, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 12, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 12, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 12, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 12, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 26, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 26, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 12, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 9, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 9, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 8, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |