USPTO serial 78393497
MELEXIS MICROELECTRONIC INTEGRATED SYSTEMS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3190908Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 2, 2007
- Examiner
- LOUGHRAN, BARBARA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MELEXIS MICROELECTRONIC INTEGRATED SYSTEMS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Concord, NH
TESSENDERLO, BE
8900 LEPER, BE
8900 LEPER, BE
8900 LEPER, BE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Anne E. Naffziger
Anne E. Naffziger LEYDIG, VOIT & MAYER, LTD.Two Prudential Plaza, Suite 4900Chicago, IL 60601UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic and microelectronic devices, namely, integrated circuits, controllers, switches, and proximity, magnetic field and electrical current sensors | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 1, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Melexis, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by MELEXIS TECHNOLOGIES NV
- Other trademarks owned by MELEXIS N.V.
- Other trademarks owned by MELEXIS N.V.
- Other trademarks owned by MELEXIS N.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named MELEXIS MICROELECTRONIC INTEGRATED SYSTEMS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 4, 2017 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jan 2, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2013 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2013 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 22, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 16, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 2, 2013 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 4, 2010 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jan 2, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 17, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 27, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 7, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 1, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 28, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 28, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 28, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 7, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2006 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 26, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 26, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 26, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 12, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 12, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 14, 2005 | GRML | CORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 10, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 6, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 5, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 1, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 17, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 8, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |