Drawing for TUSCAN KITCHEN

USPTO serial 78393742

TUSCAN KITCHEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3030843Status 711
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 13, 2005
Examiner
CARTY, GEORGIA
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TUSCAN KITCHEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Cynthia Clarke Weber

ANDREW D MANITSKY GRAVEL AND SHEA PC76 ST PAUL STREET 7TH FLOORPO BOX 369BURLINGTON, VT 05402-0369

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
043RESTAURANT SERVICESSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLEDJul 24, 2005

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 9, 2012C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL—
Feb 9, 2012CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jan 19, 2012CANDCANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999—
Apr 11, 2011PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Dec 13, 2005R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Oct 27, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 21, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 20, 2005CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER—
Oct 20, 2005IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Oct 13, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 13, 2005AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Sep 26, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 26, 2005IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Sep 26, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 6, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 6, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 6, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 21, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 21, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 4, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 4, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 20, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 8, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance