Drawing for DAYBREAK SENSATIONS

USPTO serial 78394126

DAYBREAK SENSATIONS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BORSUK, ESTHER
Law office
OFFICE OF TRADEMARK PROGRAM CONTROL

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DAYBREAK SENSATIONS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Bakery sweet goods and bread based bakery goods topped with eggs and/or cheese and/or meat and/or fruitABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 20, 2010MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Apr 20, 2010ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Apr 8, 2010EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Feb 2, 2010ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jan 5, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 5, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 2, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 2, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 2, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 1, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 1, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 29, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
May 29, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 29, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 29, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 27, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 23, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 23, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 11, 2005GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 11, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 10, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 20, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 20, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 21, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 21, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 19, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 8, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance