Drawing for DAGGER GEAR

USPTO serial 78394143

DAGGER GEAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ENGEL, MICHAEL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DAGGER GEAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stevan Lieberman

STEVAN LIEBERMAN GREENBERG & LIEBERMAN LLC2141 WISCONSIN AVE NW STE C-2WASHINGTON, DC 20007UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing, namely, hosiery, footwear, athletic shoes, sneakers, t-shirts, shirts, sport shirts, sweat shirts, tops, tank tops, sweaters, jerseys, jackets, denim jackets, wind resistant jackets, coats, pants, sweat pants, jeans, warm up suits, shorts, gym shorts, sweat shorts, boxer shorts, hats, caps, head bands, wrist bands and beaniesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 15, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 15, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 14, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 22, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 2, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 27, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 27, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 1, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 1, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 1, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 1, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 1, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 15, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 15, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 15, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 14, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 5, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 14, 2005GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 14, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 26, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 14, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 14, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 1, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 1, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 19, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 8, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance