Drawing for SKAGWAY ALASKA'S MOUNTAIN SPRING WATER

USPTO serial 78394392

SKAGWAY ALASKA'S MOUNTAIN SPRING WATER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GILBERT, REBECCA L
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SKAGWAY ALASKA'S MOUNTAIN SPRING WATER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark Crossley

MARK CROSSLEY CROSSLEY PATENT LAW400 S 3RD STMONTROSE, CO 81401-4204UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032Bottled WaterACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 23, 2005MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Aug 23, 2005ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Aug 22, 2005EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Aug 8, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 8, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 4, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 24, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 24, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 24, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jul 24, 2005PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
May 25, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 25, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 27, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 27, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 19, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 14, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 14, 2004PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Apr 9, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance