Drawing for CALIFORNIA AUDIO LABS

USPTO serial 78395361

CALIFORNIA AUDIO LABS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MURRAY, DAVID T
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CALIFORNIA AUDIO LABS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Harvey Kaye

Harvey Kaye Burns & Levinson LLP125 Summer StreetBoston, MA 02110UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Consumer electronic devices, namely, cell phones; MP3 players and recorders; DVD players and recorders; portable audio players; portable video players; combination units, namely, combined VCR and DVD players and recorders, combined DVD player and recorder and a hard drive; television sets; cameras; prerecorded DVD disks featuring movies, music and voice; prerecorded CD disks featuring music and voice; blank CD disks; blank DVD disks; computer hardware; apparatus for recording, transcribing, reproducing and/or viewing sound and/or images; and accessories for all of the listed goods, namely, headphones, microphones, AC power adapters, car battery adapters, power supplies, batteries, remote control units, carrying cases and connecting cablesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 28, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 28, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 26, 2009EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
May 26, 2009EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
May 26, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 21, 2008EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Nov 21, 2008EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Nov 21, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 2, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 2, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 2, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 11, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 2, 2008TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jan 2, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jan 2, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Dec 21, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 19, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 28, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 24, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 16, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 16, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 16, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 28, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 5, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 16, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 13, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 12, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 20, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 13, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 10, 2006PGRRPETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED—
Jul 27, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 27, 2005PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jul 27, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 26, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 26, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 28, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 28, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 25, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 12, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance