USPTO serial 78395534
MEDIAPUCK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARROLL, DORITT
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MEDIAPUCK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Scottsdale, AZ
Scottsdale, AZ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence Letham
LAWRENCE LETHAM LETHAM LAW FIRM LLC914 N TUCANA LNGILBERT, AZ 85234UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware and software for interconnecting, managing, securing and operating local and wide area networks; electronic communication devices, namely, personal digital assistants, pagers; wireless communications devices, namely, wireless LAN hardware and software for the transmission of voice, data, and video; storage networking products, namely routers, switches, port adapters, antennas, hubs and software used in the operation and management thereof; Virtual Private Network (VPN) hardware; VPN operating software; computer software for managing and operating computer and communications hardware over electronic, optical, or wireless communications networks; downloadable instructional materials, namely books, manuals, printed guides for teachers, test booklets, magazines, newsletters and bulletins in the fields of network communications, and managing, operating and using local, wide and global networks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 20, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 9, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 9, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 30, 2006 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jun 30, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 30, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 13, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 13, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 12, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 12, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 13, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 13, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 12, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 18, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 29, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 16, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 16, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 24, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 24, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 12, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |