Drawing for BELLE FARE

USPTO serial 78395651

BELLE FARE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MIZELLE HOWARD, DEZMONA JULYE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BELLE FARE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Clyde L. Smith

CLYDE L SMITH THOMPSON COBURN LLPONE US BANK PLZSAINT LOUIS, MO 63101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030coffee and teaACTIVE—
035retail grocery store services; retail bookstore servicesACTIVE—
041Education in the field of cooking, namely conducting instruction courses in the field of cookingACTIVE—
043providing banquet facilities; catering services; restaurant services; cafe servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 5, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 5, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 26, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 26, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 26, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 24, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 24, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 24, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 26, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 3, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 13, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 11, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 4, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 3, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 1, 2005XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 31, 2005GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 31, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 14, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 3, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 3, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 24, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 24, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 23, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 12, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance