USPTO serial 78396250
REDBALL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with REDBALL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Guerneville, CA
Guerneville, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David G. Bayles
David G. Bayles Arent Fox LLP555 West Fifth Street, 48th FloorLos Angeles, CA 90013-1065UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Advertising services, namely, direct product marketing, television commercial production, interactive marketing consulting services, direct marketing services, creating corporate and brand identity for others, managing databases for others | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, motion picture film production and television production and post-production | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer services, namely, creating web sites for others, custom software development for others, hosting internet web sites for others on a computer server for a global computer network; architectural design services; industrial design services; product research and product packaging design | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Heck, Aaron
- Other trademarks owned by Heck, Aaron
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named REDBALL
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 10, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 10, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 15, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 15, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 3, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 3, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 8, 2006 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Dec 8, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 8, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 7, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 5, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 5, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 7, 2006 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jun 7, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 7, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 9, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 5, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 11, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 22, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 5, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 29, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 28, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 28, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 27, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 12, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |