Drawing for FULL CIRCLE

USPTO serial 78396694

FULL CIRCLE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SLOAN, CYNTHIA
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FULL CIRCLE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Valerie Verret

Valerie Verret Baker Botts LLP2001 Ross AvenueSuite 600Dallas, TX 75201-2980

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018Articles made wholly or principally of leather or of imitation leather, namely trunks and travelling bags, back packs and rucksacks, sports bags, luggage, handbags, key-cases, wallets, purses, briefcases, carriers and luggage for suits and for dresses, attache cases, credit-card holders, umbrellas, parasols, holdalls, parts and fittings for all the aforesaid goodsACTIVE—
025Clothing, namely neckties; articles of underclothing, pyjamas, night-dresses, sleeping garments, negligees, dressing gowns; overalls; swimming costumes; over-trousers, caps, robes, aprons; dancewear, namely, leotards, tights, bodysuits; wristbands; footwear, namely shoes, boots, slippers; headgear, namely, baseball caps; footwear and legwear, namely, socks and leggingsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 20, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 20, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 31, 2008ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Sep 19, 2008EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Sep 19, 2008DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Sep 18, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 16, 2008EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Sep 16, 2008DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Sep 16, 2008FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Sep 16, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 13, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 13, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 13, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 18, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 18, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 18, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 25, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 16, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 16, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 19, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 27, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 7, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 8, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 28, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 25, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 25, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 5, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 4, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 14, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 11, 2005GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 11, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 3, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 25, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 25, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 26, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 26, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 14, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance