USPTO serial 78397104
EXACT SEARCH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GASKINS, TONJA M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EXACT SEARCH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard W. Mass
FRANK D DECOLVENAERE GOTTLIEB, RACKMAN & REISMAN PC270 MADISON AVENEW YORK, NY 10016-0601UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Computer services, namely, providing search engines for obtaining data on a global computer network; Displaying the websites and images of others on a computer server; Data mining services; Providing customized searching, namely, providing specific information in response to customer queries via the Internet | ACTIVE | Oct 10, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 30, 2006 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 30, 2006 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 30, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 31, 2006 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| May 4, 2006 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 27, 2006 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 24, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 25, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 23, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 31, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 17, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 13, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 15, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |