USPTO serial 78397556
SWANKY MODES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3432570Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 20, 2008
- Examiner
- SHANAHAN, PATRICK
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SWANKY MODES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Santoro, Lucio and Santoro, Meera
London, GB
Santoro, Lucio and Santoro, Meera
London, GB
Santoro, Lucio and Santoro, Meera
London, GB
Santoro, Lucio and Santoro, Meera
London, GB
Santoro, Lucio and Santoro, Meera
London, GB
Santoro, Lucio and Santoro, Meera
London, GB
HOLLISTER, CA
HOLLISTER, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely, T-shirts, sweatshirts, sweatpants, tank tops, aprons, blouses, coats, dresses, jackets, jerseys, jogging suits, gym shorts, jumpers, nightshirts, pajamas, ponchos, robes, shirts, shorts, skirts, sweaters, sweat suits, jeans, pants, vests, tops, turtlenecks, socks, camisoles, knit shirts, sweat bands, wrist bands, fleece tops and bottoms, golf shirts, raincoats, polo shirts, sleeveless shirts, beachwear, swim wear, bathing suits, bathrobes, leotards, leggings, slacks, underwear and undergarments, namely, boxer shorts, pants, bras, panties, slips, hosiery, pantyhose and tights, accessories, namely, neckwear, belts, gloves, ties, scarves, ear muffs, mittens, headgear, namely, hats, caps, baseball caps, knitted headwear, knit hats and caps, headbands, bandanas, sun visors and visors, footwear, namely, boots, shoes, sneakers and athletic shoes, sandals, slippers, flip-flop sandals | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 1, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Santoro, Lucio and Santoro, Meera
- Other trademarks owned by Santoro, Lucio and Santoro, Meera
- Other trademarks owned by Santoro, Lucio and Santoro, Meera
- Other trademarks owned by Santoro, Lucio and Santoro, Meera
- Other trademarks owned by Santoro, Lucio and Santoro, Meera
- Other trademarks owned by Santoro, Lucio and Santoro, Meera
- Other trademarks owned by SWANK FARMS PRODUCE, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SWANK FARMS PRODUCE, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named SWANKY MODES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 26, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 17, 2013 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Dec 17, 2013 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 17, 2013 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 17, 2011 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 24, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 21, 2011 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Apr 21, 2011 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 21, 2011 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 12, 2009 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 20, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 11, 2008 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 11, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 5, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 8, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2008 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Sep 20, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 7, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 9, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 12, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 21, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 29, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 25, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 25, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 13, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 23, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 18, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 14, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 9, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 5, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 10, 2005 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| Aug 31, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2004 | CNSL | SU - SUSPENSION LETTER - WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 27, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 14, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 9, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 15, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |