USPTO serial 78397980
AREN'T WE ALL SAYING THE SAME THING?
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3209801Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 13, 2007
- Examiner
- RAUEN, JAMES
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with AREN'T WE ALL SAYING THE SAME THING??
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Placerville, CA
Placerville, CA
Placerville, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ilene Goldstein Block
ILENE GOLDSTEIN BLOCK BERRY & BLOCK LLP2150 RIVER PLZ DR STE 415SACRAMENTO, CA 95833UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Metal key chains; metal key fobs; metal key rings | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 14, 2005 |
| 009 | Magnets | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 14, 2005 |
| 014 | Jewelry; and candle holders made of precious metals; picture frames of precious metal | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 14, 2005 |
| 016 | Stationery; bookmarks; bumper stickers; paperweights; coasters made of paper; paper napkins; paper placemats | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 14, 2005 |
| 018 | Goods made of leather, namely, luggage tags, purses, tote bags, and handbags | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 14, 2005 |
| 021 | Glass beverage ware; mugs, plates, bowls, vases, candle holders not made of precious metals; stained glass figurines; stained glass decorations; statues made of china | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 14, 2005 |
| 025 | T-shirts; hats; caps, scarves and belts | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 14, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Wright, Claudine
- Other trademarks owned by Wright, Claudine
- Other trademarks owned by Wright, Claudine
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named AREN'T WE ALL SAYING THE SAME THING?
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 20, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 13, 2007 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jan 5, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 4, 2007 | CNSR | ALLOWED SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 4, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 30, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 30, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 13, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 2006 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 13, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2006 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Mar 15, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 20, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 7, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 11, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 5, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 2, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 2, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 1, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 1, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 29, 2005 | CWBP | WITHDRAWN BEFORE PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 21, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 15, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 13, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 13, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 2, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 16, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |