USPTO serial 78398165
NATURAL HIGH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3156092Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 17, 2006
- Examiner
- MCMORROW, RONALD G
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with NATURAL HIGH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Van Nuys, CA
Van Nuys, CA
Van Nuys, CA
ROCKLIN, CA
KATADYN NORTH AMERICA FOODS, LLC
BROOKLYN CENTER, MN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ruth Rivard
Ruth Rivard STINSON LEONARD STREET LLP150 South Fifth Street, Suite 2300STINSON TRADEMARK ADMINISTRATORMinneapolis, MN 55402Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | PACKAGED DEHYDRATED ENTREES, CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF BEEF, SHRIMP, POULTRY AND VEGETABLES, NAMELY BURGUNDY BEEF WITH NOODLES, SHERRY BEEF WITH NOODLES; TERIYAKI BEEF WITH RICE; THAI BEEF; COUNTRY BEEF STEW; BARBECUE BEEF WITH MASHED POTATOES; BEEF STROGANOFF WITH NOODLES; CHILI MAC WITH BEEF; CHICKEN PAPRIKASH WITH NOODLES; TERIYAKI CHICKEN WITH RICE; MANDARIN ORANGE CHICKEN WITH RICE; KUNG PAO CHICKEN; SPICY THAI CHICKEN; TEQUILA CHICKEN; CHICKEN STIR-FRY; CHICKEN FAJITAS; HONEY LIME CHICKEN; HONEY MUSTARD CHICKEN; CHICKEN and BROCCOLI; TURKEY TETRAZINI; TURKEY WITH MASHED POTATOES; KUNG PAO SHRIMP; SHRIMP CANTONESE WITH RICE; SWEET AND SOUR SHRIMP WITH RICE; THAI SHRIMP; A BLEND OF CHEESE AND NATURAL GRAIN AND VEGETABLES; VEGETABLE CURRY and RICE; BLACK BEANS and RICE AND THREE BEAN CHILI; SPINACH CHEESE OMELETTES, PEASANT OMELETTES; MEXICAN OMELETTES; CHEESE OMELETTES; AND PACKAGED DEHYDRATED FRUIT CHUNKS, SLICES AND CHIPS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 1990 |
| 030 | PACKAGED DEHYDRATED ENTREES, CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF PASTA AND RICE, NAMELY; THREE CHEESE LASAGNA; SUN-DRIED TOMATO PASTA; SPAGHETTI MARINARA; ZUCCHINI LASAGNA; FETTUCINI PRIMAVERA; BEEF ENCHILADAS, CHEESE ENCHILADAS AND CHICKEN POT PIE; PACKAGED DEHYDRATED BREAKFAST AND DESSERTS, NAMELY, CINNAMON ROLLS WITH OLD FASHIONED ICING; MAPLE OAT SCONES; STRAWBERRY GRANOLA WITH MILK; RASPBERRY GRANOLA WITH MILK; LEMON PUDDING CAKE; FUDGE BROWNIES; CHOCOLATE CHEESECAKE; THREE BERRY COBBLER; CINNAMON APPLE CRISP; FRENCH VANILLA MOUSSE and RASPBERRIES AND CHOCOLATE FUDGE MOUSSE | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 1990 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by RICH-MOOR CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by RICH-MOOR CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by RICH-MOOR CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by TYRY, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by KATADYN NORTH AMERICA FOODS, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named NATURAL HIGH
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2017 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Oct 17, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 19, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 14, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 18, 2012 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2012 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 18, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 28, 2011 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 26, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 3, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 3, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 5, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 8, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 7, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 7, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 7, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 7, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 7, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 2, 2006 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| May 3, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 21, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 20, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 2, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 25, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 25, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 25, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 31, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 30, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 29, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 16, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |