USPTO serial 78398610
TREASURES OF VENICE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 11, 2008
- Examiner
- BUTTON, JENNIFER JO
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with TREASURES OF VENICE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
SPIELO INTERNATIONAL GERMANY GMBH
LUBBECKE, DE
32312 Lübbecke, DE
32312 Lübbecke, DE
32312 Lübbecke, DE
LÜBBECKE, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ursula B. Day
Ursula B. Day Law Firm of Ursula B. Day708 Third AvenueSuite 1501New York, NY 10017Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | ELECTRIC AND ELECTRONIC APPARATUS, INSTRUMENTS, DEVICES AND MACHINES, NAMELY, AUTOMATED COIN DISPENSING MACHINES, COIN AND MONEY BILL OPERATED AMUSEMENT MACHINES OPERABLE ALSO WITH MAGNETIC CARDS, MICRO-PROCESSORS AND COMPUTER CHIPS; MECHANISMS FOR COIN-OPERATED MACHINES, NAMELY, COIN, BILL AND CHIP-CONTROLLED GAMING MACHINES; APPARATUSES FOR BILLING OPERATIONS OF COIN-OPERATED MACHINES, NAMELY, COMPUTER SOFTWARE USED TO GENERATE BILLS IN CONNECTION WITH COIN OPERATED GAMING MACHINES, COMPUTERS AND COMPUTER HARDWARE; COMPUTER PRINTERS FOR USE IN CONNECTION WITH GAMING AND GAMBLING MACHINES; PRINTED ELECTRONIC CIRCUITS FOR APPARATUS AND CARDS BEARING INTEGRATED CIRCUITS; MONEY CHANGE MACHINES; VENDING MACHINES PROVIDING CHIPS, COUPONS AND GAME CARDS; ENTERTAINMENT AND CASINO GAMING AND GAMBLING EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, SLOT MACHINES; GAMING EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, GAMING MACHINES, VIDEO SLOT MACHINES AND PARTS THEREFOR; DROP-DOWN CAROUSELS FOR GAMING AND SLOT MACHINES, NAMELY, HOPPERS; TV MONITORS, LCD- MONITORS ALL FOR GAMBLING MACHINES; ELECTRONIC CASINO GAMING MACHINES; COMPUTER GAME CARTRIDGES AND ENCODED SMART CARDS CONTAINING OPERATING PROGRAMS FOR ELECTRONIC POCKET GAMES; ELECTRONIC PARLOR GAMES AND VIDEO GAMES; MAGNETIC DATA CARRIERS PROGRAMMED FOR ELECTRONIC VIDEO AND AUDIO DISPLAY AND OPERATION FOR ALL AFORE-STATED GAMES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 19, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SPIELO INTERNATIONAL GERMANY GMBH
- Other trademarks owned by Atronic International GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Atronic International GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Atronic International GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by GTECH GERMANY GMBH
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named TREASURES OF VENICE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 17, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 25, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 11, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 22, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 5, 2008 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 4, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 4, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 4, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2007 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 6, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2007 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Aug 7, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 7, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 7, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 15, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 26, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 22, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 13, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 12, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 10, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 2, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 2, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 4, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 13, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 5, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 5, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 29, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 29, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 19, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |