USPTO serial 78398997
ALL IN TO WIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3617490Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 5, 2009
- Examiner
- STOIDES, KATHERINE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ALL IN TO WIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Centereach, NY
Centereach, NY
Beverly Hills, CA
LOS ANGELES, CA
LOS ANGELES, CA
Toluca Lake, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dorie Choderker
Dorie Choderker LAW OFFICES OF DORIE CHODERKER1901 AVENUE OF THE STARSSECOND FLOORLOS ANGELES, CA 90067Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Entertainment in the nature of poker games, card games, games and gambling tournaments, contests, competitions and events; gambling services; instruction in the field of poker, card games, games and gambling | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 17, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Avigliano, Joseph
- Other trademarks owned by Avigliano, Joseph
- Other trademarks owned by The RHL Group, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by The RHL Group, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by The RHL Group, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Avigliano, Joseph
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named ALL IN TO WIN
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 11, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 5, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 30, 2009 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 3, 2009 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 1, 2009 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Feb 28, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 27, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 26, 2008 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Dec 26, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 26, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 27, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 27, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 28, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 24, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 24, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 7, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 27, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 29, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 14, 2006 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 28, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 8, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 6, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 24, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 20, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 20, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 4, 2005 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Oct 10, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 23, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 17, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 7, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 7, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 7, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 22, 2005 | CWBP | WITHDRAWN BEFORE PUBLICATION | — |
| May 16, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 13, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 12, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 12, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 12, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 11, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 17, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 19, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |