USPTO serial 78399297
PINK DIAMOND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 18, 2006
- Examiner
- ENGEL, MICHAEL
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with PINK DIAMOND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $850
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Indianapolis, IN
INDIANAPOLIS, IN
Indianapolis, IN
Indianapolis, IN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles J. Meyer
Charles J. Meyer WOODARD EMHARDT MORIARTY MCNETT & HENRY,SUITE 3700111 MONUMENT CIRCLEINDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204-5137Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | sun tanning, sunless tanning and moisturizing creams, lotions and oils | ACTIVE | Nov 1, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by First Line, Inc
- Other trademarks owned by AUSTRALIAN GOLD, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by First Line, Inc
- Other trademarks owned by First Line, Inc
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named PINK DIAMOND
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 18, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2016 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2016 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Sep 6, 2016 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Aug 29, 2016 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2016 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 5, 2016 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Aug 4, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 11, 2016 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 11, 2016 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2016 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 18, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2012 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2012 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 20, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 14, 2012 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 5, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 1, 2006 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 22, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 8, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 19, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 21, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 16, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 12, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 12, 2005 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 9, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 9, 2005 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 31, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2005 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 1, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 31, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 16, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 21, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 8, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 7, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 20, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |