Drawing for DANGER RANGERS

USPTO serial 78399433

DANGER RANGERS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUCHANAN WILL, NORA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DANGER RANGERS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Louis M. Heidelberger

Louis M. Heidelberger Gibbons P.C.1700 Two Logan Square, 18th & Arch StreePhiladelphia, PA 19103UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Paper and paper articles, namely, writing paper, construction paper, craft paper, wrapping paper, loose leaf paper; trading cards; stationery; paper and cardboard cut-out figures for use as wall decorations; gift wrapping paper; paper party goods, paper party bags, paper party decorations, paper party hats; paper cake decorations; pictures, photographic prints, mounted photographs, unmounted photographs, posters and art reproductions; publications, namely magazines for children's education and entertainment; photo and stamp albums; paper banners; cartoons, cartoon prints, newspaper cartoons; newspaper comic strips; series of comic books; bulletin boards; blackboards; clip boards; calendars; pen and pencil boxes and cases; erasers; markers; crayons; chalk; paper staplers; arts and crafts paint kits; art paper; crepe paper; painting sets for children; paper napkins; paper place mats; paper bags; decals, stickers, bumper stickers; table linens made of paper; bathroom and facial tissues; and rubber stampsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 1, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 1, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 8, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 8, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 19, 2007CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Feb 19, 2007COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Oct 26, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 26, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 26, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 8, 2006CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Aug 30, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 16, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 16, 2006DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Feb 22, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 22, 2006DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Feb 22, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 8, 2006INOAAMENDMENT AFTER NOA NOT ENTERED—
Feb 8, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 27, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 5, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 15, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 12, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 8, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 5, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 5, 2005GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 5, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 5, 2005ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Mar 30, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 25, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 21, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 21, 2005GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 21, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 18, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 1, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 1, 2005UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 1, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 14, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 14, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 1, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 21, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance