USPTO serial 78400214
STANLEY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PERKINS, ELLEN J
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with STANLEY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James R. Davis, II
James R. Davis, II Arent Fox LLP1050 Connecticut Avenue, NWWashington, DC 20036-5399UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electric, radio telecommunication and public address apparatus and instruments, namely,access control systems comprised of electronic token readers, electronically operated locks, and magnetically encoded tokens for use with the electronic token readers to admit people to buildings or areas of buildings; worker protection systems, namely, mobile handheld radio beacons for transmitting emergency distress signals and antennae for receiving emergency distress signals; radio pagers; computer programs for controlling building access and building security systems, and for notifying building emergency services; electronic computers; electronic data processors; electronic data input and output apparatus for use with computers and data processing apparatus namely, magnetic, optical, or electronically coded cards and disc readers and writers; computer software for operating, controlling, and monitoring access control, security and safety systems; electronic safety and security apparatus and instruments, namely intruder and fire alarms, and personnel tracking systems comprised of portable position and location transmitters and fixed receivers; access control systems comprised of magnetic encoded card readers, electronically operated locks, intruder alarms, and magnetically encoded identification cards for use in buildings and other secure environments; computers, electronic data processors, and control units comprised of microprocessors, for controlling electronically operated locks and doors in access control systems; network access control systems comprised of electronically operated looks and magnetic encoded identification card readers connected to a computer network; computer tokens, namely, magnetically encoded electronic identification tags to be read by access control units to permit access through doors; blank magnetic data carriers; pre-recorded magnetic data carriers featuring personnel identification information for use in access control systems | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Installation, maintenance and repair of computers, computer systems, microprocessor based control apparatus, token reading apparatus, electronic access control systems and electronic authorization systems; installation, maintenance and repair of access control and alarm monitoring systems; maintenance of access control systems, authorization systems, and alarm systems | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Educational services, namely, providing workshops, seminars, classes, and training programs in the fields of electronic access control and monitoring systems, computer systems; and alarm systems | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design and updating of computer software for others; maintenance and rental of computer software; computer rentals; computer programming for others; design of computer hardware for others; computer hardware and software consultation; consulting services in the fields of computer-controlled electronic access control and authorization systems, and alarm systems, namely consultation in the field of design of electronic access control, and alarm systems; computer systems analysis; technical and computer support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer hardware and software systems, monitoring of network systems for technical purposes, and providing back up computer programs and facilities; design and updating of computerized access control systems, authorization systems, and alarm systems; and consulting service in the field of design of access control systems, authorization systems, and alarm systems; consultation services in the field of design of computer hardware and software systems for others | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Rental of access control systems, authorization systems, alarm systems | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Stanley Logistics, L.L.C.
- Other trademarks owned by Stanley Logistics, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Stanley Logistics, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named STANLEY
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 5, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 5, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 31, 2009 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 27, 2009 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 24, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 24, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 15, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 2, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 2, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 21, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 27, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 20, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 24, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 5, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 6, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 26, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 26, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 22, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 18, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 16, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 21, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 21, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 24, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 28, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 7, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 2, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 4, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 22, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |