USPTO serial 78400402
CONVERGENCE WITHOUT COMPROMISE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LOTT, JASON E
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CONVERGENCE WITHOUT COMPROMISE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John W. Lanius
JOHN W LANIUS FUJITSU NETWORK COMMUNICATIONS INC2801 TELECOM PKWYLEGAL DEPT MAILSTOP 2CRICHARDSON, TX 75082Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Optical networking transmissions systems namely SONET and photonic switches, ATM switches, dense wavelength division multiplexers, TDM and TDM-like multiplexers, ethernet and optical switches, amplification and transmission of voice, video, data and network traffic; telecommunications hardware, namely optical loop aggregation and core transport platforms, wavelength management services platforms, tunable transponders, photonic ring and mesh platforms; telecommunications software used for providing, controlling and monitoring the operation of network elements, namely, wavelength division multiplexers, fiber optic multiplexers, amplifiers, transmitters, receivers and routers for the transmission, switching and management of voice, data and video signals and for photonic networking, optical bandwidth management, high-capacity integrated transport and access, and multiservice switching in a telecommunications network; and plug-in cards for use in connection with the transmission, protection and management of voice, data and video signals | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Installation of computer networks, computer installation and repair, maintenance of computer hardware, installation, maintenance, repair, analysis, monitoring and testing of voice, data and video networks; installation and maintenance of telecommunications network project and program management | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Telecommunications network services, namely, electronic transmission of voice, data and video signals; electronic data interchange services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer diagnostic services; design and deployment of telecommunications network project and program management; integration of computer systems and networks and network management for others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Fujitsu Network Communications, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named CONVERGENCE WITHOUT COMPROMISE
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 9, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 9, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 8, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 20, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |